Screener
XHS vs IXJ
State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF vs iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- XHS costs 0.05% less per year.
- IXJ is significantly larger than XHS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XHS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XHS | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $98M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2011 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.0% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.1% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.56% | 14.46% |
| Max drawdown | -39.32% | -27.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XHS and IXJ
Explore further