Screener
XJH vs BELT
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- XJH costs 0.63% less per year.
- XJH is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XJH follows a index tracking strategy; BELT uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| XJH | BELT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $372M | $9M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.4% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.49% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -25.07% | -23.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XJH and BELT
Explore further