Screener
XJH vs ESML
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- XJH costs 0.05% less per year.
- ESML is significantly larger than XJH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ESML has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XJH | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $372M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 0.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.1% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.42% | 16.76% |
| Max drawdown | -25.07% | -41.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XJH and ESML
Explore further