Screener
XJH vs IMCB
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IMCB costs 0.08% less per year.
- IMCB is significantly larger than XJH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IMCB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IMCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XJH | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $372M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2020 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.4% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.49% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -25.07% | -40.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XJH and IMCB
Explore further