Screener
XJH vs INTF
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares International Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- INTF is significantly larger than XJH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, INTF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XJH | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $372M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 2.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.4% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.49% | 14.65% |
| Max drawdown | -25.07% | -40.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XJH and INTF
Explore further