Screener
XJR vs ISCF
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- XJR costs 0.12% less per year.
- ISCF is significantly larger than XJR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XJR covers north america markets; ISCF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ISCF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XJR | ISCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $138M | $633M |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 3.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | +25.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.8% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.3% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 14.44% |
| Max drawdown | -27.14% | -40.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XJR and ISCF
Explore further