Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XJR vs MIDE

iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF vs Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF

XJR

iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.12%

Fund size

$138M

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF

Xtrackers

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$4M

Key differences

  • XJR is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, MIDE has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

XJRMIDE
Annual cost (TER)0.12%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$138M$4M
Since20202021
Dividend yield1.00%1.37%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+29.5%+26.9%
CAGR 3Y+15.1%+16.3%
CAGR 5Y+5.5%+7.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.610.73
Volatility 1Y17.92%15.95%
Max drawdown-27.14%-24.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XJR and MIDE