Screener
XLBI vs PSCM
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
Key differences
- PSCM costs 0.06% less per year.
- PSCM is significantly larger than XLBI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLBI is classified as alternative, while PSCM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XLBI follows a option income strategy; PSCM uses index tracking.
- PSCM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLBI | PSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $21M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.01% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +58.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.94% |
| Max drawdown | -10.63% | -51.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLBI and PSCM
Explore further