Screener
XLF vs HECO
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF vs State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
Key differences
XLF is an equity ETF, while HECO is an alternative ETF. XLF charges 0.08% a year and HECO 0.90%.
- XLF is an equity fund, while HECO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- XLF follows a index tracking strategy; HECO uses option income.
- XLF costs 0.82% less per year.
- XLF is much larger than HECO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLF | HECO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49.4B | $116M |
| Since | 1998 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +117.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.62% | 37.71% |
| Max drawdown | -42.86% | -43.74% |
Similar to XLF and HECO
Explore further