Screener
XLF vs SPYM
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- SPYM costs 0.06% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SPYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLF | SPYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.02% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51.5B | $137.6B |
| Since | 1998 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.52% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.45% | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -42.86% | -33.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLF and SPYM
Explore further