Screener
XLII vs RSPN
State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF
Key differences
- XLII costs 0.05% less per year.
- RSPN is significantly larger than XLII — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLII is classified as alternative, while RSPN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XLII follows a option income strategy; RSPN uses index tracking.
- RSPN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLII | RSPN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $981M |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.81% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.47% |
| Max drawdown | -10.10% | -42.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLII and RSPN
Explore further