Screener
XLP vs SZK
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples
Key differences
- XLP costs 0.87% less per year.
- XLP is significantly larger than SZK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLP follows a index tracking strategy; SZK uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, XLP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLP | SZK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.5B | $5M |
| Since | 1998 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.7% | -6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.5% | -4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | -5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | -0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.44% | 24.61% |
| Max drawdown | -24.51% | -86.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLP and SZK
Explore further