Screener
XLV vs KBE
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF
Key differences
- XLV costs 0.27% less per year.
- XLV is significantly larger than KBE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KBE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLV | KBE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37.9B | $1.5B |
| Since | 1998 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.24 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.56% | 21.59% |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -53.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLV and KBE
Explore further