Screener
XLV vs PSCH
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
Key differences
- XLV costs 0.21% less per year.
- XLV is significantly larger than PSCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XLV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLV | PSCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37.9B | $129M |
| Since | 1998 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 0.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +12.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | +1.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | -5.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.24 | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.56% | 20.29% |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -47.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLV and PSCH
Explore further