Screener
XLY vs RXI
State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF vs iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- XLY costs 0.31% less per year.
- XLY is significantly larger than RXI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XLY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLY | RXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23.1B | $268M |
| Since | 1998 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 1.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +12.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.18% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -39.67% | -35.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLY and RXI
Explore further