Screener
XME vs XLF
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLF costs 0.27% less per year.
- XLF is significantly larger than XME — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $51.5B |
| Since | 2006 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.9% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.1% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.0% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.18% | 14.45% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -42.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and XLF
Explore further