Screener
XMHQ vs XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ is significantly larger than XMLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XMHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.2B | $750M |
| Since | 2006 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.7% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.56% | 10.30% |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMHQ and XMLV
Explore further