Screener
XMLV vs ACWV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Key differences
- ACWV is significantly larger than XMLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XMLV covers north america markets; ACWV covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, XMLV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 2.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 7.75% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -28.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and ACWV
Explore further