Screener
XMLV vs RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.14% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RWK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2013 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 16.84% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -46.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and RWK
Explore further