Screener
XMLV vs SPMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Key differences
- SPMO costs 0.12% less per year.
- SPMO is significantly larger than XMLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPMO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | SPMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $16.0B |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +42.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +23.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 17.45% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -30.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and SPMO
Explore further