Screener
XMLV vs VSMV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.10% less per year.
- XMLV is significantly larger than VSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VSMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | VSMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $153M |
| Since | 2013 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 9.20% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -31.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and VSMV
Explore further