Screener
XNAV vs FAAR
FundX Aggressive ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
Both XNAV and FAAR are alternative ETFs. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and FAAR 0.98%. The main difference: XNAV follows a active selection strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- FAAR costs 0.29% less per year.
- FAAR is much larger than XNAV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $176M |
| Since | 2002 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | 9.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.1% | +33.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | +11.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 13.49% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -18.03% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.