Screener
XNAV vs FFEM
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
- FFEM costs 0.67% less per year.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while FFEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; FFEM uses index tracking.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $39M |
| Since | 2002 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.5% | +63.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 21.43% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -16.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and FFEM
Explore further