Screener
XOEF vs PPH
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
Key differences
Both XOEF and PPH are equity ETFs. XOEF charges 0.20% a year and PPH 0.36%. The main difference: XOEF costs 0.16% less per year.
- XOEF costs 0.16% less per year.
- PPH is much larger than XOEF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XOEF | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $942M |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.68% |
| Max drawdown | -7.66% | -29.70% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.