Screener
XOEF vs SPXN
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF
Key differences
- SPXN costs 0.11% less per year.
- SPXN is significantly larger than XOEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XOEF | SPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $74M |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -7.66% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XOEF and SPXN
Explore further