Screener
XOP vs PBOG
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF vs Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil and Gas and Exploration and Production Index ETF
Key differences
- PBOG costs 0.22% less per year.
- XOP is significantly larger than PBOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XOP is classified as alternative, while PBOG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XOP | PBOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.6B | $549M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.54% | — |
| Max drawdown | -82.61% | -11.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XOP and PBOG
Explore further