Screener
XPH vs XLF
State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF vs State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLF costs 0.27% less per year.
- XLF is significantly larger than XPH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XLF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XPH | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $355M | $51.5B |
| Since | 2006 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 1.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.3% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.29% | 14.45% |
| Max drawdown | -35.96% | -42.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XPH and XLF
Explore further