Skip to content
Screener

XQQI vs IWMI

NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF vs NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

XQQI

NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

Annual cost

0.98%

Fund size

$183M

IWMI

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

Annual cost

0.68%

Fund size

$909M

Key differences

Both XQQI and IWMI are alternative ETFs. XQQI charges 0.98% a year and IWMI 0.68%. The main difference: IWMI costs 0.30% less per year.

  • IWMI costs 0.30% less per year.
  • IWMI is much larger than XQQI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

XQQIIWMI
Annual cost (TER)0.98%0.68%
Fund size (AUM)$183M$909M
Since20262024
Dividend yield1.71%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+30.5%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y15.15%
Max drawdown-12.53%-23.88%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to XQQI and IWMI