Screener
XRMI vs PFFV
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.35% less per year.
- PFFV is significantly larger than XRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XRMI is classified as alternative, while PFFV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- XRMI follows a option income strategy; PFFV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PFFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XRMI | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49M | $302M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 12.65% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.0% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.42% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -15.36% | -18.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XRMI and PFFV
Explore further