Screener
XSHD vs RPG
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG is significantly larger than XSHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XSHD | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2016 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 5.33% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.7% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.8% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.91% | 19.62% |
| Max drawdown | -49.52% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XSHD and RPG
Explore further