Screener
XSHQ vs LCOW
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Key differences
- XSHQ costs 0.20% less per year.
- XSHQ is significantly larger than LCOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XSHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XSHQ | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $246M | $23M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.54% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -38.33% | -10.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XSHQ and LCOW
Explore further