Screener
XSHQ vs REMC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- XSHQ follows a index tracking strategy; REMC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| XSHQ | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $246M | — |
| Since | 2017 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.57% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.33% | -6.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XSHQ and REMC
Explore further