Screener
XSHQ vs RFV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- XSHQ costs 0.06% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XSHQ | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $246M | $313M |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.9% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.54% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -38.33% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XSHQ and RFV
Explore further