Screener
XSLV vs RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- XSLV costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RZG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RZG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XSLV | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $121M |
| Since | 2013 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.57% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.20% | 18.58% |
| Max drawdown | -44.34% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XSLV and RZG
Explore further