Screener
XSLV vs VB
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF vs Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VB costs 0.22% less per year.
- VB is significantly larger than XSLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XSLV | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $177.4B |
| Since | 2013 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 2.57% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.20% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -44.34% | -42.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XSLV and VB
Explore further