Screener
XT vs BFLX
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.06% less per year.
- XT follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- XT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | — |
| Since | 2015 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.06% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -0.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and BFLX
Explore further