Screener
XT vs IGV
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGV costs 0.07% less per year.
- IGV is significantly larger than XT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | IGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $12.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | -8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.93% | 25.67% |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -45.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and IGV
Explore further