Screener
XTN vs XLF
State Street SPDR S&P Transportation ETF vs State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLF costs 0.27% less per year.
- XLF is significantly larger than XTN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XLF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XTN | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $51.5B |
| Since | 2011 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 1.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.2% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.19% | 14.47% |
| Max drawdown | -43.77% | -42.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XTN and XLF
Explore further