Screener
XUDV vs DIVZ
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF vs Polen Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- XUDV costs 0.56% less per year.
- DIVZ is significantly larger than XUDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XUDV follows a index tracking strategy; DIVZ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| XUDV | DIVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $242M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.27% | 9.19% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XUDV and DIVZ
Explore further