Screener
XUDV vs GEND
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- XUDV costs 0.29% less per year.
- XUDV is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XUDV is classified as equity, while GEND is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XUDV follows a index tracking strategy; GEND uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| XUDV | GEND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $4M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.27% | 10.70% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -6.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XUDV and GEND
Explore further