Screener
XUDV vs TDVG
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF vs T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- XUDV costs 0.41% less per year.
- TDVG is significantly larger than XUDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XUDV follows a index tracking strategy; TDVG uses active selection.
- TDVG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XUDV | TDVG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.27% | 9.79% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -19.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XUDV and TDVG
Explore further