Screener
XYLD vs RYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, XYLD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XYLD | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.73% | 10.82% |
| Max drawdown | -33.46% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XYLD and RYLD
Explore further