Screener
XYLG vs EHY
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- XYLG costs 0.40% less per year.
- XYLG is significantly larger than EHY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XYLG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XYLG | EHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $4M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.75% | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.30% | -51.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XYLG and EHY
Explore further