Screener
XYLG vs QRMI
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- XYLG costs 0.25% less per year.
- XYLG is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XYLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XYLG | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $16M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 12.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.77% | 5.77% |
| Max drawdown | -21.30% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XYLG and QRMI
Explore further