Screener
YANG vs CHAU
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares
Key differences
- YANG costs 0.16% less per year.
- YANG follows a inverse strategy; CHAU uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YANG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YANG | CHAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $110M | $104M |
| Since | 2009 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.4% | +73.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -35.0% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.34 | 0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.29% | 33.23% |
| Max drawdown | -99.53% | -78.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YANG and CHAU
Explore further