Screener
YANG vs WEBL
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- WEBL costs 0.07% less per year.
- YANG covers emerging markets markets; WEBL covers north america.
- YANG follows a inverse strategy; WEBL uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, WEBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YANG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YANG | WEBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $110M | $113M |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.4% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | +42.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -35.0% | -15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.34 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.29% | 55.72% |
| Max drawdown | -99.53% | -94.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YANG and WEBL
Explore further