Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

YBTC vs BITO

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF vs ProShares Bitcoin ETF

YBTC

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$158M

BITO

ProShares Bitcoin ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$1.9B

Key differences

  • BITO is significantly larger than YBTC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • YBTC is classified as alternative, while BITO is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.

Side-by-side comparison

YBTCBITO
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$158M$1.9B
Since20242021
Dividend yield78.98%71.92%
Asset classalternativecryptocurrency
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption income
CAGR 1Y-27.3%-34.1%
CAGR 3YN/A+31.6%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.73
Volatility 1Y38.70%43.11%
Max drawdown-47.09%-77.86%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to YBTC and BITO