Screener
YBTC vs DFII
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF vs FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF
Key differences
- DFII costs 0.10% less per year.
- YBTC is significantly larger than DFII — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| YBTC | DFII | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $20M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 78.98% | 25.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -25.8% | -29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.71% | 40.89% |
| Max drawdown | -47.09% | -48.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YBTC and DFII
Explore further