Screener
YFYA vs AMAX
Yields for You Strategy A ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- YFYA costs 0.11% less per year.
- YFYA is classified as mixed asset, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- YFYA follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YFYA | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.25% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $60M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.22% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.51% | 10.01% |
| Max drawdown | -2.29% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YFYA and AMAX
Explore further