Screener
YINN vs WEBL
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- WEBL costs 0.38% less per year.
- YINN is significantly larger than WEBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YINN is classified as cryptocurrency, while WEBL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, WEBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YINN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YINN | WEBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.34% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $766M | $113M |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.0% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -5.5% | +42.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -37.5% | -15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.22% | 55.72% |
| Max drawdown | -98.59% | -94.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YINN and WEBL
Explore further